Here are some comparison charts to prove it. As if that weren't enough, unlike Adblock Plus (ABP), uBlock uses significantly fewer resources. Also, web pages look "cleaner" and without so much superfluous content to distract me. In my experience, since using uBlock, the browsing speed has taken a really remarkable leap.
uBO is a browser extension that's dependant on the browser's extensions API (and thus inherits the limitations of the API). Another point to keep in mind is that uBlock -as well as ABP, AdGuard, and some others- allows users to enter their own filters, something that is not possible with Ghostery or Disconnect. I assume you're comparing uBlock Origin to AdGuard for Windows, however the answer is no it's not. Instead, I recommend that you try other free alternatives, such as Disconnect o uBlock.
Adguard vs adblock vs ublock firefox software#
While Ghostery is very efficient, not only is it not free software but there are serious suspicions that through the "GhostRank" function it sells data on the blocked ads to the advertising companies themselves. UBlock works in both Chromium / Chrome and Firefox and, unlike Ghostery, is distributed using the GPLv3 license, making it a tool for FOSS. It also brings support for hosts files and allows you to add other sources, in addition to those that come "from the factory". These lists include EasyList, EasyPrivacy, Malware Domains, and others that allow you to block trackers, social widgets, and much more. According to its creators, it leaves a very light CPU and memory footprint and, despite this, it can load and enforce thousands of filters used by other popular blockers, such as AdBlock Plus (ABP) or Ghostery.
It blocks ads as it supports Adblock Plus filter syntax, but extends that syntax and is designed to work with custom filters and rules. UBlock It is not a mere ad blocker it is a general purpose blocker.
0 kommentar(er)
